COVID-19 Records

NIH Hid Public Comments Package — page 57

of 128 pages

← p.56 p.58 → · this page in the original PDF · package

/OD) [E] > /OD) [E] Lankford, nate (NIH/OD) [E] limeni, Lydia 2PM much for your help! 1. The NIH Facebook and Instagram pages currently link to the privacy policy, https://www.nih.gov/about/privacy.htm. Would you have any concerns about adding a link on both pages to the comment moderation guidelines in addition to the privacy policy? *This is not a request yet, the DOJ is just weighing options.* 2. To prove the point that inflammatory comments may dissuade interested citizens from visiting the social media pages: Has the NIH received any complaints about animal rights comments on its social media pages? Has it received complaints about other comments that it considers to be "off-topic" or "inflammatory"? If so, do you have any specific proof or examples? 3. In your last response, you mentioned NIH has had some form of guidelines for moderating content since November 2012. Can you provide the guidance used prior to the March 30, 2015 guidelines were posted? 4. The Plaintiffs believe Facebook account holders can set the "level" of the profanity filter (weak/strong/etc.). What level has the NIH selected for its Facebook profanity filter? 5. During the relevant time period (Sep 2020 to now), has the NIH set any Facebook Live video-specific filtering? 6. On Facebook, is it possible that "non-animal" would be hidden because it contains the filtered word "animal"? Thank you, Sarah J. Imhoff, JD, MHSA Senior Attorney Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division, NIH Branch (direct) @nih.gov This e-mail message is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. It may contain information that is protected, privileged, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender immediately. From: Fine, Amanda (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 7:43 PM To: Imhoff, Sarah (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov>; Kern, Anna (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov> Cc: Spruill, Crystal (NIH/OD) [C] < @nih.gov>; Prince, Scott (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov>; Lankford, David (NIH/OD) [E] < @od31tm1.od.nih.gov>; Myles, Renate (NIH/OD) [E] < @mail.nih.gov>; Polimeni, Lydia (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov> Subject: RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information Hi Sarah- Thanks for the update! I'm out next week, but Renate will be in. Good news on the extended deadline! Have a great holiday season and a happy new year! Amanda From: Imhoff, Sarah (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 6:52 PM To: Fine, Amanda (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov>; Kern, Anna (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov>

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/nih_public_comments/57

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
nih_public_comments:email:00035 2021-12-22 email 57–58
RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information 2021-12-22 email 57
RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information 2021-12-27 email 56–57