NIH Hid Public Comments Package — page 52
of 128 pages
← p.51 p.53 → · this page in the original PDF · package
/OD) [
nate (NIH/OD) [E]
)E)
/OD) [
nate (NIH/OD) [E]
)E)
Lankford,
limeni, Lydia
Lankford,
limeni, Lydia
(direct)
@nih.gov
This e-mail message is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. It may contain information that is protected,
privileged, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you
have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
From: Kern, Anna (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:44 AM
To: Imhoff, Sarah (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Cc: Spruill, Crystal (NIH/OD) [C] <
@nih.gov>; Prince, Scott (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Lankford,
David (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od31tm1.od.nih.gov>; Myles, Renate (NIH/OD) [E] <
@mail.nih.gov>; Polimeni, Lydia
(NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Fine, Amanda (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Haley Spencer
<
@palladianpartners.com>
Subject: RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information
Hi Sarah,
Yes - we'll get you those answers by COB. We'll elaborate in our response, but yes - while those activists posted from
their own Twitter accounts, they tagged @NIH and used the NIH designated hashtag for the chat #NIHChat to ensure their
responses appeared in the chat feed, so those comments did take place on a hashtag that NIH created. In addition to the
activists, PETA tagged NIH and used the hashtag as well.
Thanks,
Anna
From: Imhoff, Sarah (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:32 AM
To: Kern, Anna (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Cc: Spruill, Crystal (NIH/OD) [C] <
@nih.gov>; Prince, Scott (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Lankford,
David (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od31tm1.od.nih.gov>; Myles, Renate (NIH/OD) [E] <
@mail.nih.gov>; Polimeni, Lydia
(NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Fine, Amanda (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Haley Spencer
<
@palladianpartners.com>
Subject: RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information
Hi Anna,
Is there any way you could get these answers to me by COB today? Thanks. I received a little more information on the
Twitter question:
Plaintiffs are arguing that the relevant Twitter posts took place on the animal rights activists' own Twitter accounts;
according to Plaintiffs, those Twitter posts did not take place on NIH's page. My understanding is that, perhaps, those
activists "tagged" NIH's Twitter handle, which caused their comments to appear on NIH's Twitter page. Is that correct?
Thanks,
Sarah J. Imhoff, JD, MHSA
Senior Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Public Health Division, NIH Branch
(direct)
@nih.gov
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/nih_public_comments/52
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2022-01-18 | 52–53 | |
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2022-01-18 | 52 | |
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2022-01-18 | 51–52 |