Gates Package — page 1170
of 1375 pages
← p.1169 p.1171 → · this page in the original PDF · package
PANDEMIC I - THE FIRST MODERN PANDEMIC
As we get into the summer, some locations that maintain behavior change will experience exponential decline.
However, as behavior goes back to normal, some locations will stutter along with persistent clusters of infections
and some will go back into exponential growth. The picture will be more complex than it is today, with a lot
of heterogeneity.
Have we overreacted?
It is reasonable for people to ask whether the behavior change was necessary. Overwhelmingly, the answer is yes.
There might be a few areas where the number of cases would never have gotten large numbers of infections and
deaths, but there was no way to know in advance which areas those would be. The change allowed us to avoid
many millions of deaths and extreme overload of the hospitals, which would also have increased deaths from
other causes.
The economic cost that has been paid to reduce the infection rate is unprecedented. The drop in employment
is faster than anything we have ever experienced. Entire sectors of the economy are shut down. It is important
to realize that this is not just the result of government policies restricting activities. When people hear that an
infectious disease is spreading widely, they change their behavior. There was never a choice to have the strong
economy of 2019 in 2020.
Most people would have chosen not to go to work or restaurants or take trips, to avoid getting infected or
infecting older people in their household. The government requirements made sure that enough people changed
their behavior to get the reproduction rate below 1.0, which is necessary to then have the opportunity to resume
some activities.
The wealthier countries are seeing reduced infections and starting to think about how to open up. Even as a
government relaxes restrictions on behavior, not everyone will immediately resume the activities that are allowed.
It will take a lot of good communication so that people understand what the risks are and feel comfortable going
back to work or school. This will be a gradual process, with some people immediately doing everything that
is allowed and others taking it more slowly. Some employers will take a number of months before they require
workers to come back. Some people will want the restrictions lifted more rapidly and may choose to break the
rules, which will put everyone at risk. Leaders should encourage compliance.
Differences among countries
The pandemic has not affected all countries equally. China was where the first infection took place. They were
able to use stringent isolation and extensive testing to stop most of the spread. The wealthier countries, which have
more people coming in from all over the world, were the next to be affected. The countries that reacted quickly
to do lots of testing and isolation avoided large-scale infection. The benefits of early action also meant that these
countries didn't have to shut down their economies as much as others.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/gates/1170
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pandemic Innovation memo | 2020-04-22 | 1167–1171 |