Tony's Diary Package — page 906

Later in the interview, Buttar claimed that the majority of deaths from the delta variant of the novel coronavirus were caused by "vaccine injury," despite the fact that the vast majority of deaths came from the unvaccinated. "I don't want to be part of this mass genocide that I see happening," Buttar told him. "And I think that what's going on right now will be remembered as a worst time in history compared to... World War II." "I just want to be straight with you," said Griffin. "I think you're crazy." Oct. 21, 2021 Larry Tabak, representing the NIH, released some progress reports from the EcoHealth grant which were late in their submission. It indicated thatn mice became sicker than the controls and could be interpreted by some as "gain of function" even though it does not qualify for P3CO. As expected, this led to an avalanche of extremists calling Larry, Frances, and I liars. This was all lead by the infamous Richard Ebright who made a tweet as shown below. I must write something about this complete idiot In my book since he really is a horrible person: The NIH received the relevant documents in 2018 and reviewed the documents in 2020 and again in 2021. The NIH--specifically, Collins, Fauci, and Tabak--lied to Congress, lied to the press, and lied to the public. Knowingly. Willfully. Brazenly. In addition, a number of people: Mark Meadows, Sen. Tom Cotton and others are tweeting that I lied under oath PRESS: CBS :Mornings" with Gayle King; Oct. 22, 2021 - Global - 242,000,000/4,900,000; USA - 45,100,000/730,000; Larry Tabak was treated very poorly by several Republican congressmen and senators that he briefed yesterday. They continue to distort the truth insisting that I and to some extent doctor Collins have lied about whether or not the NIH funded "gain of function" research. They do not understand nor do they seem to want to understand that we were operating under the framework of P3CO which clearly indicates that the experiments that were funded by the NIH in Wuhan fell under that auspices and were properly conducted according to the existing guidelines at the time. They want to hear none of that and continue to insist that we are denying that gain of function research was done and they put forth the preposterous suggestion if not the strong indication that