Fauci Awards Package (Redacted) — page 36
of 136 pages
← p.35 p.37 → · this page in the original PDF · package
understanding that due to a restructuring of NAS, all the business interactions between the Academies and Federal
agencies go through NAS. Thus, NIAID has no current financial, contractual, or similar dealings with NAM.
In order for Dr. Fauci to accept the cash prize, we reviewed the exception to the gift rules for meritorious public service or
achievement at section 2635.204(d) (emphasis added):
(1) An employee may accept a bona fide award for meritorious public service or achievement and any item
incident to the award, provided that:
(i) The award and any item incident to the award are not from a person who has interests that may be
substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee's official duties, or from
an association or other organization if a majority of its members have such interests;
The definition of "person" is found at section 2635.102(k) and is:
(k) Person means an individual, corporation and subsidiaries it controls, company, association, firm, partnership,
society, joint stock company, or any other organization or institution, including any officer, employee, or agent of
such person or entity. For purposes of this part, a corporation will be deemed to control a subsidiary if it owns 50
percent or more of the subsidiary's voting securities. The term is all-inclusive and applies to commercial ventures
and nonprofit organizations as well as to foreign, State, and local governments, including the Government of the
District of Columbia. It does not include any agency or other entity of the Federal Government or any officer or
employee thereof when acting in his official capacity on behalf of that agency or entity.
The "National Academy of Sciences (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation." 36 USC §
150301. Pursuant to its Mission statement, NAS "is a private, non-profit society [and is] charged with providing
independent, objective advice to the nation on matters related to science and technology." The Act to Incorporate the
National Academy of Sciences (aka the Academy Charter) states "the Academy shall, whenever called upon by any
department of the Government, investigate, examine, experiment, and report upon any subject of science or art . . . ."
Academy Charter at §3. While a corporation is a "person" under section 2635.102(k), I argue that the type of corporation
that NAS is - a federally chartered corporation, with its exceptional mission to advise the Federal Government - is not the
type of corporation that OGE intended to include in the definition. First, OGE could have, but did not include in the
definition of "person" any discussion of federally chartered corporations, perhaps because of their uniqueness. And it's
this uniqueness which makes the application of section 2635.204(d) unnecessary. NIAID works with NAS because it is
directed to do so by Congress and because NAS offers NIAID an expertise that cannot be found elsewhere. NAM did not
"return the favor" to NIAID when it selected Dr. Fauci as its 2021 Lienhard awardee. Its relationship with NIAID is rooted
in legislation and will continue regardless of an unrelated award to NIAID's Director. Last, OGE stated that "['person'] does
not include any agency or other entity of the Federal Government . . . ." I concede that NAS is not a part of the Federal
Government. However, in 1997, Congress amended the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to include the National
Academy of Sciences under some of FACA's provisions. See Congressional Research Service report, Congressionally
Chartered Nonprofit Organizations ("Title 36 Corporations"): What They Are and How Congress Treats Them (July 14,
2008). There, CSR noted that the FACA amendment was:
[T]he first instance in which Congress has made [federally chartered corporations] subject to the provisions of a
general management law, and while the action may be supportable on public policy grounds, it does, to the
extent of the applicable provisions, diminish the private character of the affected organizations. As such, it
constitutes a precedent with implications.
CSR Report at 7. FACA's partial application to NAS further supports viewing NAS as a different kind of corporate entity that
is outside of the regulatory definition of "person." Therefore, if NAS is not a "person," NAS' non-person status extends to
NAM, an entity established under NAS' charter. Consequently, the pending NIAID-NAS matters do not make a gift from
NAM a prohibited gift for Dr. Fauci under the applicable regulations.
In the alternative, if you find NAS to be a "person" under 2635.102(k), then you should not find it to be the same "person"
as NAM. Even though NAM was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the definition
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/fauci_awards/36
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci | 2021-02-05 | 35–37 |