Fauci Awards Package (Redacted) — page 16

From: "Jaffe, Holli Beckerman (NIH/OD) [E]" To: "Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E]" Ce: "Schwetz, Tara (NIH/OD) [E]" Subject: RE: Draft for your review Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:07:17 -0500 Importance: Normal Sure, will do. From: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E] {i @ nih.gov> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 5:50 PM To: Jaffe, Holli Beckerman (NIH/OD) [E] @od.nih.gov> Cc: Schwetz, Tara (NIH/OD) [E] @nih.gov> Subject: Re: Draft for your review It would help if you drafted the note to Tony for me. but I will send it, from me. Thanks larry From: "Jaffe, Holli Beckerman (NIH/OD) [E]" - @od.nih.gov> Date: Friday, January 29, 2021 at 5:41 PM To: "Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E]" @nih.gov> Cc: "Schwetz, Tara (NIH/OD) [E]" nih.gov> Subject: RE: Draft for your review Thanks Larry. I truly believe Gretchen is stuck -- she was given very specific orders that she feels she cannot deviate from. And Id be happy to "take the bullet for you" and write Tony. The matters have been in my office, not yours. From: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E] EEE @ vib.zov> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 5:37 PM To: Jaffe, Holli Beckerman (NIH/OD) [E] @od.nih.gov> Cc: Schwetz, Tara (NIH/OD) [E] @nih.gov> Subject: Re: Draft for your review Ok -- 1 will stand down and write to Gretchen as you suggest. Will run by draft. I will also modify note that I will send to Tony and run by you before I hit send. larry From: "Jaffe, Holli Beckerman (NIH/OD) [E]" ERE @ 0d. nih.gov> Date: Friday, January 29, 2021 at 5:26 PM To: "Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E]" @nih.gov> Cc: "Schwetz, Tara (NIH/OD) [E]" @nih.gov> Subject: RE: Draft for your review Disregard my request to talk, pls. I believe the better approach is for you to write Gretchen and ask her to review the package she has (NAM) and the others (AAAS (re-review), CDC and Dan David) once her office receives them. We discussed that approach last evening. From me, Gretchen knows Tony wants final decisions and is pressing you to go to HHS to get them. Pls contact her first. Up until now, OGC has not been the reason for the delay. (I said last night that NAM's delay lies mostly with me.) Perhaps Gretchen only needs a reason to ask for a revised prioritization of her work.