Diary Prequel Package — page 379
of 465 pages
← p.378 p.380 → · this page in the original PDF · package
Oct 12, 2014 (Sunday) - A very important issue that arose this weekend. Very early in
the morning at approximately 5:45 t0 6:00 AM, I received an e-mail from Leslie Dach
that there would be a conference call with Sylvia, Lisa Monaco, White House Comms
(Palmieri), Tom Frieden, me, etc. about a breaking situation. A nurse (turned out to be
- see below) who had been caring for
at the Dallas hospital
reported to be ill. It is felt that there was likely an innocent, inadvertent breaking of
protocol on the part of the nurse. She had taken direct care of
during very
serious parts of his illness including hemodialysis, intubation, and insertion of a rectal
tube. The nurse became febrile on Friday evening, reported to authorities on Saturday, the
preliminary Ebola test was done on Saturday and the results came back positive on
Sunday (today), subsequently confirmed by CDC. I was just getting ready to go on the
Sunday morning shows today when the phone call came to discuss what approach we
would take. This ignited an extraordinary media frenzy in which Tom Frieden. I was
virtually on every show. I was on "This Week" on ABC as well as "Meet the Press" as
well as CNN "State of the Union" as well as evening CNN. There is now considerable
concern in the country that the United States government keeps saying that we are
prepared and then something like this happens which creates a credibility gap. I have
been intensively emphasizing on my interviews that we need to distinguish between the
unlikelihood that there will be an outbreak which still does not change since the contact
tracing that has been done with the
case is working and there is a good umbrella
over and identification of the people who were contacts and they are currently being
monitored either actively or on their own. This needs to be distinguished from a
inadvertent breach of protocol in which a healthcare worker has gotten infected which is
bad for health care workers but really has nothing to do with an outbreak in the country. I
have been continually expressing this in my interviews.
One issue that has come up is a concern on the part of nurses throughout the country that
the use of the term "breach" in protocol implies that the nurses are to blame and this
nurse in particular was to blame. I have been very active in emphasizing that this is not
the case that this is an inadvertent, innocent, "breach" of protocol and that we need to
intensify the training for the nurses. The nurses themselves have said that they are
inadequately trained and although the protocol might be a good protocol, they are not
trained to implement the protocol. The CDC has responded by being very proactive in
increasing their training with webinars, conference calls, and active visits on the part of
CDC staff to the involved hospital in Dallas as well as to anywhere else where this
situation might arise.
Press - This Week (ABC); Meet the Press, CNN State of the Union; CNN evening.
Oct.13, 2014 - One of the busiest press days that I have had. Media frenzy at high pitch.
Much, much criticism of the USG and CDC is particular saying that the USG and CDC
keep telling us we have everything under control and still there are many mis-steps. I
have been calmly explaining on TV and radio that people should not conflate what is
working, i.e. the lack of an outbreak because of the proper implementation of isolation
and care of Ebola patients and the infection of a health care worker. Clearly, HCWs are
not implementing the CDC PPE protocol. CDC people went down to Dallas and the
HCWS are doing a lot of things incorrectly. Thus, the ability of our hospital to recognize
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/diary_prequel/379
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2014 (Sunday) - A very important issue that arose this weekend. Very early in | 2014-10-12 | diary entry | 379–380 |