Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted) — page 93
of 155 pages
← p.92 p.94 → · this page in the original PDF · package
DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
As part of the thought process, there were two
questions. There were two ideas that came forward. One
was why don't sarbecoviruses have furin cleavage sites.
And I've studied coronaviruses all my life. I know
sarbecoviruses. I've seen zoonotic strains. They don't
have furin cleavage sites. MERS strains do. Human
coronaviruses do. Feline coronaviruses do. Why don't
sarbecos? There should be sarbecos out there that have
furin cleavage sites, so they were going to look for them.
Once they found them and they sequenced it they were
going to work on it with pseudotypes. They were going to
drop those spike genes into pseudotypes and ask what's --
we were also going to look at the receptor binding domain,
obviously, and I think we hypothesized in there that there
should be strains with 25 percent variation in spike that
could still use the ACE2 receptor. And those are obviously
of interest because if you're interested in developing pan18
sarbecovirus vaccines or drugs you want, in essence, the
bookends of the heterogeneity that exists in the virus
subgenus, right. You want strains that you know and
strains that are very different, because you have no idea
what would emerge in the future. So if you have breadth
then you have a better chance of developing something that
could be used immediately.
So those are two major features. The first part would
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/baric_ti/93
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| baric_ti:utt:00829 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 92–94 |