Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted) — page 70
of 155 pages
← p.69 p.71 → · this page in the original PDF · package
DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
significant contributions to science.
Then they do straw polls to down-select the most
heavily supported individuals. Those are then taken to a
larger committee and presented to the entire Academy from
all the different sections. That group then ultimately
makes the final list for voting, and then they do voting
the beginning of April. Like the voting will probably end
in the next few days, if it hasn't already ended for this
next year's nominees that are being inducted. And then
they're announced probably sometime within the next week or
two, depending on the Academy. That's the process.
MS. SALAZAR: And so your understanding is that was
convened by NIH?
DR. BARIC: No. You're confusing induction into the
National Academy of Sciences with sponsored research that
the National Academy does for Federal institutions. So the
NIH wanted the National Academy to form a group that would
review the COVID outbreak. That group will include
National Academy members as well as individuals who are not
National Academy member but knowledgeable experts in the
field.
MS. SALAZAR: I guess my question is, why was NIH
convening this group? Because the same members, right, Dr.
Fauci, Francis Collins were in other groups.
DR. BARIC: I think, again, you need to talk to the
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/baric_ti/70
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| baric_ti:utt:00593 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 69–70 |
| baric_ti:utt:00594 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 70 |
| baric_ti:utt:00595 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 70 |
| baric_ti:utt:00596 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 70 |
| baric_ti:utt:00597 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 70–71 |