Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted) — page 143

no reason to disbelieve them..." " ion... 1107367898\1\AMERICAS 1. Page 1 - I should be identified as "Senior Partner," as opposed to "Senior Counsel." 2. Page 3, line 5: "Menarchery" should read "Menachery" 3. Page 13, line 12: "affected" should read "effective" 4. Page 21, line 4, It should read, "To your knowledge, he didn't have an EcoHealth employee..." 5. Page 33, line 16: "Freeman" should read "Frieman" 6. Page 41, line 10: "Freeman" should read "Frieman" 7. Page 41, line 23: "Genentech" should read "GemPharmatech" 8. Page 45, line 16, It should read, "I had no reason to disbelieve them..." 9. Page 53, line 16, It should read, Again, that's a decision..." 10. Page 58, lines 17-24, Per line 23, the committee agreed to redact mention of name. 11. Page 64, line 22: "NASM" should read "NASEM" 12. Page 98, line 15, "...which has never been shown..." 13. Page 98, line 25: "except" should read "excepted" 14. Page 108, line 25: "equivocally" should read "unequivocally" 15. Page 117, line 8: "Menarchery" should read "Menachery" 16. Page 118, line 15: "is it" should read "it is" 17. Page 118, line 19, "...I put a mark on your paper." 18. Page 121, line 14: "their" should read "the" 19. Page 121, line 19: "job" should read "lab" 20. Page 122, line 18 through Page 124, line 23, We'd asked that the whole discussion be deleted on national security grounds. 21. Page 131, an "errant" "O" in the middle of the page. 22. Page 135, line 4, "programs." 23. [Missed the page and line] "Elaine Chen" is referenced once, and should read "Alina Chan" Errata Provided by Counsel to Mr. Baric