Reading Room Production, p.82 · reading_room:email:00086
Page text: p.82 · original PDF
- Date
- 2021-06-29 00:00 (month precision)
- Type
- email · email
00:
To: Clare Thomas
nature.com>
Subject: Re: RE: RE: A question about the addendum to your Nature paper
Dear Clare,
Thank you for your information. I'm fine with the passing to the journalist on the information I told you.
Best regards,
Zhengli,
AEX: "Clare Thomas"
AG
AY [A]:202 1-06-29 04:39:21
WEA:
Wh.iov.cn"
pik:
=E #1: RE: RE: A question about the addendum to your Nature paper
nature.com>
a)
wh.iov.cn>
Dear Zhengli,
Thanks again for replying to my question about the discrepancy highlighted to us. We've received some queries
about it from journalists. Conversations between editors and authors are confidential but
I wanted to ask you if you
would have any objection to our passing on the information that you have told us? Would you be willing for us to
tell the journalists that you have told us that the bioinformatics approaches used to analyse the genome
sequences in the Nature paper and the thesis were different? We are considering how to respond and wonder
whether this might help dampen the speculation. Please could you let me know?
All the best,
Clare