Attachment

Or, if test supplies were limited, the site might determine that their case wasn't a high enough priority and notify them when they could be tested. Not only would the site have made sure that testing kits were used most efficiently--for the people most likely to actually test positive--it also would have given the government additional information about parts of the country where too few people were showing an interest in getting tested. With this data, the government could have directed more resources toward getting the word out and expanding testing in those areas. The site would also have provided people with instant eligibility to participate in a clinical trial, if they tested positive or were at high risk, and it could later have been used to help make sure that vaccines went to the people at the highest risk of getting severely sick or dying. And it would be useful in non-pandemic times too for fighting other infectious diseases. Any software company worth its salt could have built this site in no time,* but instead states and cities were left to their own devices, and the whole process was chaotic. It was like the Wild West. I remember one especially heated call with people from the White House and CDC in which I was quite rude about their refusal to take this basic step. To this day I don't understand why they wouldn't let the most innovative country in the world use modern communications technology to fight a deadly disease. 3. In the face of something the world should have been * Microsoft would've done it for free, and I'm sure many other companies would have too.