Attachment
Gates Package, p.155 · gates:exh:00073
Page text: p.155 · original PDF
- Date
- — (unknown precision)
- Type
- attachment · document
- Topics
- Gates Foundation involvement
alternative intervention that would remove the problematic pollutants. He also noted a healthy
skepticism regarding the actual attributable burden of disease and the cultural challenges of
using a new system. Collins agreed that simply counting numbers of delivered stoves is not the
right metric and that we need the science to demonstrate the potential utility of any intervention.
Collins then referenced the MEPI program jointly to build capacity in sub-Saharan African
universities which is currently an NIH partnership with OGAC, HRSA, CDC. Bill stated "we feel
badly" that we don't fund this capacity building. He noted the potential value of K-RITH. He said
we should look at this and consider if and if so how and to whom we should contribute and what
the metrics for success would be.
Bill suggested that MOOCs might be able to target high-end nurses or low-end doctors and
really generate net benefit in knowledge to the medical system in developing countries.
Collins proposed that we should look to have an annual meeting between key leaders at all the
relevant NIH institutes (not just NIAID in whom we have already been doing this) and BMGF
leaders to learn from each other and foster more effective collaboration. Bill endorsed this idea.
Follow-up:
=
Chris W. to follow-up on meeting with all relevant NIH institutes (similar to NIAID)