RE: October 7 visit of Bill Gates
Gates Package, pp.108-110 · gates:email:00085
Page text: p.108, p.109, p.110 · original PDF
- Date
- 2013-11-13 11:45
- Type
- email · email
- sender
- Robert Eiss
- to
- Daozhong Jin
This text appears inside a quoted reply chain — it is evidence that the message was circulating, not necessarily a new message.
If of interest to Dr Tabak, the following was published in the Financial Times the Friday before last.
It's well done
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/dacd1f84-4 1 bf-11e3-b064-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2je9a7qXd
November 1, 2013 11:05 am
°
°
°
°
°
An exclusive interview with Bill Gates
By Richard Waters
The internet is not going to save the world, says the Microsoft co-founder, whatever Mark Zuckerberg and Silicon Valley's
tech billionaires believe. But eradicating disease just might.
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> ©Amanda Friedman
Gates photographed at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in Seattle in September
Bill Gates describes himself
as a technocrat. But he does not believe that technology will save the world. Or, to
be more precise, he does not believe it can solve a tangle of entrenched and interrelated problems that afflict
humanity's most vulnerable: the spread of diseases in the developing world and the poverty, lack of opportunity
and despair they engender. "I certainly love the IT thing," he says. "But when we want to improve lives, you've
got to deal with more basic things like child survival, child nutrition."
These days, it seems that every West Coast billionaire has a vision for how technology can make the world a
better place. A central part of this new consensus
is that the internet is an inevitable force for social and
economic improvement; that connectivity is a social good in itself. It was a view that recently led Mark
Zuckerberg to outline a plan for getting the world's unconnected 5 billion people online, an effort the Facebook
boss called "one of the greatest challenges of our generation". But asked whether giving the planet an internet
connection is more important than finding a vaccination for malaria, the co-founder of Microsoft and world's
second-richest man does not hide his irritation: "As a priority? It's a joke."
Then, slipping back into the sarcasm that often breaks through when he is at his most engaged, he adds: "Take
this malaria vaccine, [this] weird thing that I'm thinking of. Hmm, which is more important, connectivity or
malaria vaccine? If you think connectivity is the key thing, that's great. I don't."
At 58, Bill Gates has lost none of the impatience or intellectual passion he was known for in his youth. Sitting in
his office on the shore of Seattle's Lake Washington, the man who dropped out of Harvard University nearly four
decades ago and went on to build the world's first software fortune is more relaxed than he was. He has a better
haircut and the more pronounced air of self-deprecation that comes with being married and having children who
have reached adolescence. But, with the relentless intellectual energy he has always brought to bear on whatever
issue is before him, he still can't resist the jibes at ideas he thinks are wrong-headed. After the interview, his
minders call to try and persuade me to not report his comments on Zuckerberg: as a senior statesman of the tech
and philanthropic worlds, it doesn't help these days to pick fights.
There is no getting round the fact, however, that Gates often sounds at odds with the new generation of
billionaire technocrats. He was the first to imagine that computing could seep into everyday life, with the
Microsoft mission to put a PC on every desk and in every home. But while others talk up the world-changing
power of the internet, he is under no illusions that it will do much to improve the lives of the world's poorest.
"Innovation is a good thing. The human condition -- put aside bioterrorism and a few footnotes -- is improving
because of innovation," he says. But while "technology's amazing, it doesn't get down to the people most in
need in anything near the timeframe we should want it to".
It was an argument he says he made to Thomas Friedman as The New York Times columnist was writing his
2005 book, The World is Flat, a work that came to define the almost end-of-history optimism that accompanied
the entry of China and India into the global labour markets, a transition aided by the internet revolution. "Fine,
go to those Bangalore Infosys centres, but just for the hell of it go three miles aside and go look at the guy living
with no toilet, no running water," Gates says now. "The world is not flat and PCs are not, in the hierarchy of
human needs, in the first five rungs."
It is perceptions
such as this that have led Gates to spend not just his fortune but most of his time on good works.
Other billionaires may take to philanthropy almost as a mark of their social status but, for Gates, it has the force
of
a moral imperative. The decision to throw himself into causes like trying to prevent childhood deaths in the
developing world or improving education in the US was the result of careful ethical calculations, he says.
Quoting from an argument advanced by moral philosopher Peter Singer, for instance, he questions why anyone
would donate money to build a new wing for a museum rather than spend it on preventing illnesses that can lead
to blindness. "The moral equivalent is, we're going to take I per cent of the people who visit this [museum] and
blind them," he says. "Are they willing, because it has the new wing, to take that risk? Hmm, maybe this
blinding thing is
slightly barbaric."
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> ©Sipa Press/Rex Features
Gates, aged 25, photographed in 1981 with Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen
Through the stroke of pen on cheque book, Gates probably now has the power to affect the lives and wellbeing
of
a larger number of his fellow humans than any other private individual in history. The Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation, which he set up with his wife in 1997 and where he has been working since leaving his full-time
role at Microsoft five years ago, gives away nearly $4bn a year. Much of the money goes toward improving
health and fighting poverty in developing countries by tackling malaria or paying for vaccination drives against
infectious diseases. This is nearly half
as much as the US government spent on global health initiatives in 2012.
In many ways, Gates was the archetype for the successful tech entrepreneur, the driven nerd who created an
industry with little more than foresight and drive. But to the generation of aspiring techno-visionaries who have
followed, the arc of his career no longer has the allure it once did, even if his iconic status is
assured. These
include people such as Peter Diamandis, a serial entrepreneur who founded the X Prize, which in 1996 offered a
$10m award for the first private sector organisation that could create a suborbital space rocket. He likes to think
big, and his latest brainstorm involves trying to mine minerals on passing asteroids.
According to Diamandis, the Gates Foundation, with its focus on alleviating the suffering of the poorest, smacks
of the early 20th-century philanthropy of the robber barons -- men such as Andrew Carnegie and John D
Rockefeller, who built and then milked monopolies before spending their later years doling out cash to worthy
causes. The latest wave of techno-visionaries, he says, is focused instead on creating whole new industries
capable of changing the world.
At the height of its powers, the way that Microsoft wielded its PC monopoly to maximise profits from the
computing industry made it feared and hated by rivals and start-ups alike. Now, with the PC world on the wane
and the company's leadership and direction in doubt, it is spoken of almost with disdain in Silicon Valley -- even
though it remains the third biggest tech company based on stock market value, behind Apple and Google.
Gates Foundation project
Partnering with Coca-Cola and Ghana's health services
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Coca-Cola is found in the remotest places on the planet. The foundation is working with the multinational
beverage company to use their supply chain expertise to help Ghana's health service improve delivery of
vaccines to the most difficult-to-access patients, including more efficient management of refrigeration systems.
Gates fends off questions about Microsoft, though he says -- contrary to persistent speculation -- that he is not
about to step back in to run it as Steve Jobs once returned to revive Apple. He also admits that the company is
taking up a much bigger slice of his time than the one day a week to which he signed up after he left. As
chairman and a member of the committee searching for a replacement to Steve Ballmer as chief executive, Gates
says he still holds regular meetings with some of the company's product groups and that he expects to spend
considerable time working with the next boss after an appointment is made.
To Diamandis's argument that there is more good to be done in the world by building new industries than by
giving away money, meanwhile, he has a brisk retort: "Industries are only valuable to the degree they meet
human needs. There's not some -- at least in my psyche -- this notion of, oh, we need new industries. We need
children not to die, we need people to have an opportunity to get a good education."
It takes more than money to rid the world of
a scourge such as polio -- though having buckets of cash certainly
helps. Also needed are ambitious thinking, organisational knowhow and the ability to bring new ideas to bear on
old problems. These are also the kind of things that go into creating a successful technology company. This time
around, though, Bill Gates the CEO has had to take a back seat to a less familiar persona: Bill Gates the
diplomat.
When the Gates Foundation made polio eradication a priority five years ago, the global anti-polio effort was
running into the sand. More than 10 years of progress had given way, at around the turn of the millennium, to a
stalemate as vaccination efforts in the countries still harbouring the disease failed to reach the coverage levels
needed to push it into extinction. The organisations behind the existing drive -- such as Rotary International, the
business group that had long led the effort -- "had sort of naively assumed it was on track, but it wasn't", Gates
says. "The idea that business as usual was going to get us there -- it had to be broken out of that, because it
wasn't going to succeed. It probably would have been better to just give up than do business as usual. But that
would have been horrific."
Gates seems to relish nothing more than challenging business as usual, often by applying a dose of more
ambitious thinking. It was the same impetus that led him to rethink familiar approaches to philanthropy, throwing
his money into the urgent pursuit of solutions to big problems rather than attempting a drip-feed of donations that
would amount to little more than a Band-Aid. While the foundations started by the likes of Howard Hughes and
pharmaceuticals boss Sir Henry Wellcome are still among the handful of the world's richest decades after their
Links shared
- news http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/dacd1f84-4