RE: Decision on Gustav O. Lienhard Award

Fauci Awards Package (Redacted), p.48 · fauci_awards:email:00076

Date: 2021-02-23 22:06
Type: email · email
cc: Holli Beckerman Jaffe
sender: Anthony S. Fauci
to: Lawrence A. Tabak
Topics: Awards, honoraria and recognition Intelligence community assessments

This text appears inside a quoted reply chain — it is evidence that the message was circulating, not necessarily a new message.

Larry: Many thanks to you and Holli for trying so hard on my behalf. It is much appreciated. Best regards, Tony

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-23 13:54 Lawrence A. Tabak open

Tony, With much credit to Holli, we presented a detailed argument first to HHS's Office of the General Counsel (OGC) (pasted below, reading bottom up) and then to the independent US Office of Government Ethics (OGE) to try to persuade them that NAM's relationship with Government agencies is unique, and thus, an award from NAM should be viewed differently than one bestowed by other non-profit corporations. Unfortunately, neither OGC nor OGE was convinced to change their previous determination regarding NAM so that you would be permitted to accept the cash prize under the applicable regulations. I am very disappointed that we did not get a different decision. You are most deserving of the additional recognition. Larry
2021-02-23 22:06 Anthony S. Fauci

Larry: Many thanks to you and Holli for trying so hard on my behalf. It is much appreciated. Best regards, Tony
2021-02-23 22:08 Lawrence A. Tabak open

Fyi; I don't think Tony will raise the issue, but just in case. We went all out, and failed... Larry