COVID-19 Records

Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), p.117 · baric_ti:utt:01013

Page text: p.117 · original PDF

Date
2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type
transcript segment · interview
recipient
Christina Salazar, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker
Ralph S. Baric
I would say that 99 percent of them were done as MTA agreements. There would probably be outliers, occasionally, but that would be on existing projects where collaborations exist through a grant, and reagents are needed to further the aims of the grant.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Yes.
  2. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    -- are there cases where there may not be?
  3. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Well, sometimes for large program project grants there would be a universal MTA created among all of the researchers so that you can share reagents. That's one form. And the other form is somebody will call and ask you for reagents and you do an MTA agreement.
  4. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Going back to --
  5. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric
    I would say that 99 percent of them were done as MTA agreements. There would probably be outliers, occasionally, but that would be on existing projects where collaborations exist through a grant, and reagents are needed to further the aims of the grant.
  6. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Did you have a UBMTA with NIH-RML? What's the date on this? It's from 2023, on pangolin beta coronaviruses, where it looks like you would be providing original material to Vincent Munster from RML. Pangolin coronavirus was the original material, and the transmittal fee to reimburse the provider for preparation and distribution costs amount is zero. Is that something that was executed? DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
  7. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I recall sending them WIV1 and SHSC014 for studies in bats. It's possible that we sent them the pangolin coronavirus. I'd have to check the MTA agreements.
  8. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    I guess, is that something that's published, the pangolin beta coronavirus? What is that?
  9. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I had mentioned it previously. It's called pangolin coronavirus GD strain, and it was published in Nature Microbiology.

Full conversation →