A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
There were other people on that grant, so Peter Daszak.
-
Yes, he would have been there.
-
But he never raised it. To me it's odd that you wouldn't recall that.
-
If he would've raised it, I would've remembered it then, because he would've put it in context.
-
2026-04-10 09:00
Christina Salazar
And he would've told you, right.
-
Yeah. I think you have to think about where the focus of the research community was. My focuses, at the time, were to rapidly develop mouse models so that we could test mRNA-LNP-based vaccines against SARS-2, to work with Gilead to get their drug forward into clinical trials, to get molnupiravir, a second drug that was FDA approved for use in humans, into clinical trials. DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
-
But, you know, part of the conversation --
-
Yeah, hindsight is always 20/20 in this case. So you can look at a document and say why can't I remember.
-
No. I mean, I think part of the conversation, though, for a long time, was, I mean, the debate over whether it was a natural original, a lab leak, you know, accidental or not. I mean, this was a conversation that was happening in the public. There were multiple papers authored. We had Proximal Origins. People were shamed and called conspiracy theorists. I mean, is that not true?