A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
And then some National Academy members. Do you have any reason to believe that there were individuals from other agencies that were involved but not maybe overtly listed?
-
I was surprised that the ODNI member was there. So if an ODNI member was there, there may have been more members from other intelligence groups there, as well, but they wouldn't have risen to my level of attention.
-
Is that common for the National Academies?
-
I've only been on a few committees. I don't recall that being common.
-
2026-04-10 09:00
Christina Salazar
Okay.
-
I can't say for certain. I mean, National Academy does a lot of work with the Federal Government, so they could do much more sensitive research with different DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com members of the intelligence community and different groups. I just am not knowledgeable enough to know the answer to that question.
-
And were you ever involved in any National Academies work that involved the intelligence community?
-
No. That's the first time I realized that I recognize them, because they were in that email, they were there. Now, whether they participated in any calls beyond the first one is whole nother question. You'd have to look at downstream emails.
-
And then I missed a couple that I'm seeing right now. Robert Bull?