COVID-19 Records

Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), p.69 · baric_ti:utt:00590

Page text: p.69 · original PDF

Date
2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type
transcript segment · interview
recipient
Ralph S. Baric, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker
Christina Salazar
So what's the difference between being an inducted member versus being an expert that's asked --

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    So how does that work with the National DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com Academies? So you can be an inducted member --
  2. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Sure.
  3. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    -- but you can also participate in National Academy work.
  4. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    It's not uncommon for both the National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Medicine to ask experts to participate in developing documents.
  5. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar
    So what's the difference between being an inducted member versus being an expert that's asked --
  6. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Well, an inducted member has to go through the review process by formal members and then voted on by the entire Academy about whether they should be included in that honorary group or not.
  7. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    And what does that mean? Are there privileges that are --
  8. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    The process is, as described to me when I first became a member, very esoteric and difficult to understand. But each section in the National Academy will open up a -- begin the process of thinking about new members to induct into the National Academy for their section. And members will nominate individuals. Those individuals will be presented to that section, in terms of a five-minute review of what they did, why it's significant, and where science would be should they not have existed. So you're looking for people who made DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com significant contributions to science. Then they do straw polls to down-select the most heavily supported individuals. Those are then taken to a larger committee and presented to the entire Academy from all the different sections. That group then ultimately makes the final list for voting, and then they do voting the beginning of April. Like the voting will probably end in the next few days, if it hasn't already ended for this next year's nominees that are being inducted. And then they're announced probably sometime within the next week or two, depending on the Academy. That's the process.
  9. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    And so your understanding is that was convened by NIH?

Full conversation →