Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), pp.65-66 · baric_ti:utt:00553

Date: 2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type: transcript segment · interview
recipient: Ralph S. Baric, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker: Christina Salazar

Yeah, I don't want to misspeak, but I think that's generally how he described it, and someone will hand me a paper so I can correct the record if I'm DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com wrong on exactly how he framed it. He framed it as, let's just say, a negative interaction. And again, this is him recalling it after the fact. He did not know you were on the call.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open

Okay. So on the February 3rd call, which is the National Academies call, you did speak in that call. Correct?
2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open

Mm-hmm.
2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open

And you had, you know, confrontations -- I think that's how Kristian Andersen --
2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open

Is this the Kristian Andersen conference?
2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar

Yeah, I don't want to misspeak, but I think that's generally how he described it, and someone will hand me a paper so I can correct the record if I'm DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com wrong on exactly how he framed it. He framed it as, let's just say, a negative interaction. And again, this is him recalling it after the fact. He did not know you were on the call.
2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open

Which call are you talking about?
2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open

The February 1st call.
2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open

He may not have, yeah.
2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open

And he, I think the way he phrased it is he felt like you were using all of the information to then attack him on the February 3rd call.

Full conversation →