COVID-19 Records

Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), p.33 · baric_ti:utt:00195

Page text: p.33 · original PDF

Date
2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type
transcript segment · interview
recipient
Ralph S. Baric, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker
Christina Salazar
That's just my commentary.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    I mean, was the conversation, were they worried? What was the tone of it? I mean, we see -- and again, these have been FOIA'd -- there's a spur of sending out that paper, within hours, to multiple different people. Now, you know, a lot of the emails don't have commentary, but it's on February 1st. We know what else happened on February 1st.
  2. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Well, I think you need to put it in context. So in China there was a massive social media barrage of speculation that the 2015 virus was the cause of the pandemic. NIH had to become aware of that at some point, and they would immediately then be worried whether everything was done properly. They had to be. And it's five years back, so again, these are things that are not going to be at the top of anyone's mind. But at the same time, they're going to want to know was everything done properly. So yeah, I think naturally that they would be concerned, naturally they'd want to know, is that virus the cause of the pandemic or not? I mean, if they didn't ask those kinds of question, they would be really irresponsible.
  3. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    That's kind of irresponsible that they didn't have the paperwork too.
  4. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Well -- DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
  5. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar
    That's just my commentary.
  6. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I would guess that most large organizations will take a while to find the paperwork.
  7. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    So they asked you to provide the paperwork. I mean, did you alert them that this was an accusation that it could have been the 2015 virus? You know, where did that come from?
  8. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Initially it came from the Chinese, social media speculation about what was the cause of the pandemic. The question certainly came up, and I can tell you the same thing that I told them, as far as this virus differs from the SARS coronavirus-2 strain by over 6,000 nucleotides, which means that it's incredibly different. So there's no way it could ever be associated with the emergence of this virus. It's just not possible. Same thing with the WIV1 virus. That's been validated by I don't know how many independent investigators around the globe. When they compare the sequence they say it is not the cause of the pandemic.
  9. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Okay. So what else was discussed in the meeting?

Full conversation →