A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
We had a paper that was coming out in Nature Communications on January 10th, and so I called the journal and asked them if it was okay if I could share it with the Chinese and the other people on the call, so we did.
-
And so I have a little bit of information that might refresh your recollection. You just tell me if this sounds familiar. So Peter Daszak was also on the call. Does that refresh your --
-
Not with the Chinese.
-
Not with the Chinese. With Eric Stemmy.
-
2026-04-10 09:00
Ralph S. Baric
Oh, he may have been. Yes, he may have DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com been.
-
And it sounds like, the notes that I have -- and again, if you don't recall this, just let me know -- it appears that you may have mentioned that you had some confidentiality issue with remdesivir, within Nature Communications.
-
Yeah.
-
Okay. And that you were willing to share what you knew with leadership at NIH, but that you couldn't share it. You had to have some kind of assurance that it wouldn't be shared more broadly.
-
I don't recall this, but he may have been wanting a copy of the paper that I just mentioned. I may have sent it to them. I don't see why I wouldn't. The big question would be whether Gilead would have a problem, not that I would have a problem with it.