Private channel session 609
2 messages over 24m, 2020-11-24 – 2020-11-24.
A “conversation” here is an activity session — a run of messages with under 60 minutes of silence inside it. The channel had no native conversation boundaries.
-
That twitter thread was literally what I emailed them when their preprint was on Researchsquare. But they still submitted it to biorxiv. It is also pretty much the review they got reject from Nature with. They are suckers forpunishment. Next step is Harvard puts out a press release.
-
So arrogant too - I emailed the first author originally but he sent a really patronising reply, CC'ing in all of his coauthors, that they were 'aware of the issue' but had controlled for it by doing a Sao Paulo only analysis. I replied toexplain how that didn't fix the non-independence but certainly revealed it. Then no reply before the BioRxiv came out. Hopefully editors and reviewers will have seen the twitter thread.