Private channel session 142

4 messages over 8m, 2020-06-08 – 2020-06-08.

A “conversation” here is an activity session — a run of messages with under 60 minutes of silence inside it. The channel had no native conversation boundaries.

1. 2020-06-08 15:26 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.62
   The corrected article has also just disappeared.
2. 2020-06-08 15:31 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.62
   It is indeed a major concern that scientific debates on Twitter make it into the NYT. Maybe we should debate, onTwitter, if scientific debates on Twitter should make it into the NYT and see if that gets into the NYT?
3. 2020-06-08 15:34 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.62
   Yes
4. 2020-06-08 15:34 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.62
   I can see the Forbes article. Starts with: _June 8: This article has been substantially updated to reflect criticism of the published study, along with the general scientific consensus on Covid-19. It also clarifies Sørensen's financial interest in the development ofthe_ Biovacc-19 _coronavirus vaccine_. _This context did not appear in original post_ New claims that the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was engineered have been dismissed by scientific and intelligence experts.